The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform
Title: The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform
Published by: Oxford University Press
Release Date: March 22, 2013
Chief Justice John Roberts stunned the nation by upholding the Affordable Care Act--more commonly known as Obamacare. But legal experts observed that the decision might prove a strategic defeat for progressives. Roberts grounded his decision on Congress's power to tax. He dismissed the claim that it is allowed under the Constitution's commerce clause, which has been the basis of virtually all federal regulation--now thrown in doubt.
In The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform, Andrew Koppelman explains how the Court's conservatives embraced the arguments of a fringe libertarian legal movement bent on eviscerating the modern social welfare state. They instead advocate what Koppelman calls a "tough luck" philosophy: if you fall on hard times, too bad for you. He argues that the rule they proposed--that the government can't make citizens buy things--has nothing to do with the Constitution, and that it is in fact useless to stop real abuses of power, as it was tailor-made to block this one law after its opponents had lost in the legislature. He goes on to dismantle the high court's construction of the commerce clause, arguing that it almost crippled America's ability to reverse rising health-care costs and shrinking access.
Koppelman also places the Affordable Care Act within a broader historical context. The Constitution was written to increase central power, he notes, after the failure of the Articles of Confederation. The Supreme Court's previous limitations on Congressional power have proved unfortunate: it has struck down anti-lynching laws, civil-rights protections, and declared that child-labor laws would end "all freedom of commerce, and . . . our system of government [would] be practically destroyed." Both somehow survived after the court revisited these precedents. Koppelman notes that the arguments used against Obamacare are radically new--not based on established constitutional principles.
Ranging from early constitutional history to potential consequences, this is the definitive postmortem of this landmark case.
“Andrew Koppelman has magnificently captured the current legal, political and policy-related lay of the land in Washington. His insightful analysis here should be mandatory reading for anyone concerned about the future of health care in America.”
—Tom Daschle, former Senate Majority Leader
“This book is a tour de force. It offers a compendium of telling facts and provocative arguments concerning the Affordable Care and the legal and political debates surrounding it. Koppelman persuasively unmasks a political and constitutional vision that says 'Tough Luck!' to the disadvantaged and reveals how that vision almost killed the health care act.”
—Richard Fallon, Harvard Law School
“This is the definitive book on the Affordable Care Act decision. Koppelman explains clearly and concisely the history of the lawsuit, the mandate it challenged, and the constitutional provisions on which the challenge was based. Most importantly, Koppelman explains the decision's implications for the future.”
—Timothy Jost, The Washington and Lee University School of Law
“Unlike the Affordable Care Act itself, Koppelman's Tough Luck Constitution is a short and enjoyable read. Like the Act, this book speaks truth about the public interest and offers a hopeful vision for the health care reform.”
—William Eskridge, Yale Law School
“Professor Koppelman's analysis of the constitutional fight to stop health reform is must-reading for anyone who desires a deeper understanding of the Constitutional story behind one of the most intense legal battles ever waged over a seminal advance in U.S. social welfare policy. Neither health policy nor constitutional theory and practice will ever be quite the same.”
—Sara Rosenbaum, George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services
“Koppelman’s trenchant descriptions and hard-hitting analysis make The Tough Luck Constitution the best account I have seen of the Health Care Case or almost any other Supreme Court litigation.”
—Prof. Michael Dorf, Cornell Law School